Early vs. Delayed Rehabilitation After Acute Injury – Southeast Sports Seminars

Early vs. Delayed Rehabilitation After Acute Injury

Stop the R.I.C.E – A Recommendation from the Guy that Started it All
October 26, 2017
What you Say Matters – How Your Words Can Affect Your Patient Outcomes
November 29, 2017

It’s no secret that rest, under most circumstances, is just about the worst thing you can recommend for a patient with a musculoskeletal injury.  Although it was very apparent what NOT TO DO, it has been unclear as to what the best course of treatment immediately following an acute injury actually is.

Well, now it appears that EARLY exercise intervention may actually be just what the doctor ordered.

In a recent study published in the New England Journal of Medicine, a group of physicians for the Tendon Research Group Bispebjerg set out to investigate the effects of early vs. delayed onset of rehabilitation on post-injury return-to-sport timeline.

“This study shows the clinical consequences of protracted immobilization after a recreational sports injury. Starting rehabilitation 2 days after injury rather than waiting for 9 days shortened the interval from injury to pain-free recovery and return to sports by 3 weeks without any significant increase in the risk of re-injury. The observed difference supports the importance of early loading of injured musculotendinous tissue.”

This is no surprise for those practitioners in the FAKTR camp since this is something we’ve been advocating for years. Early, but appropriate, loading of tissue with exercise (optimal loading) helps patients heal faster.

You can read the full study from the New England Journal of Medicine here.